Request a Call Back

How to filter out na in R language


Below is the code:

library(tidyverse)  df <- tibble(      ~col1, ~col2, ~col3,      1, 2, 3,       1, NA, 3,       NA, 2, 3  )

I can remove all NA abservations with the help of drop_na():

df %>% drop_na()

Or remove all NA in a single column (col1 for example):

df %>% drop_na(col1)

Why I cannot just use a regular != filter pipe ?

df %>% filter(col1 != NA)

Why do we use a special function from tidyr to remove NAs?


   2020-02-22 in Python by Rakesh | 332,485 Views



Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked (*)



All answers to this question.


The dplyr package includes the 'filter()' function for filtering data, but its capabilities extend beyond that. With dplyr, you can execute filtering operations that may be challenging or complex to achieve using SQL or conventional business intelligence tools, all in a straightforward and intuitive manner. For instance, consider a flight dataset where we can eliminate NA values using the filter keyword.

flight %>%  select(FL_DATE, CARRIER, ORIGIN, ORIGIN_CITY_NAME, ORIGIN_STATE_ABR, DEP_DELAY, DEP_TIME, ARR_DELAY, ARR_TIME) %>%  filter(!is.na(ARR_DELAY))

   Answered 2022-08-24 by Johnson


Is it possible to generate a list similar to the one below to identify the rows that contain no null values, and subsequently use this list with the dplyr function to filter rows based on their position values?

In this case, na.omit(airquality$Ozone) will yield the values that are not null.

Afterward, can we supply the list of positions to the filtering function?

   Answered 2022-05-15 by Calyrisa


In R, null values do not possess a concept of equality. Consequently, the expression NA == NA yields NA. In reality, comparing NA with any object in R will also result in NA. The filter function in dplyr necessitates a boolean argument. Therefore, when it processes col1 and checks for inequality using filter(col1 != NA), the command 'col1 != NA' consistently produces NA values for every row in col1. Since this does not constitute a boolean expression, the filter function fails to evaluate correctly.

   Answered 2022-04-25 by Veena


Try this:

df %>% filter(!is.na(col1))

   Answered 2022-03-15 by Veena

  • Thanks, that worked

       Commented 2022-04-02 by Babalu

  • This was simple, direct and perfect...thank you!

       Commented 2022-04-19 by Vishnu


This is not directly related to dplyr::filter. However, any comparison involving NA, such as NA==NA, will yield NA as a result.
R is unaware of the context of your analysis.
Essentially, it does not permit comparison operators to treat NA as a valid value.
Are you considering a career in data analysis? Our Data Analyst Certification Course will provide you with the essential tools and techniques for success.

   Answered 2022-02-11 by Manojverma


Suggested Questions

How to find index of element in..
Posted 2021-06-14 by iCert Global.
How to download s3 bucket folder?..
Posted 2020-03-16 by iCert Global.
Python AWS Boto3 How do i read..
Posted 2020-03-12 by iCert Global.
How to filter out na in R..
Posted 2020-02-22 by iCert Global.
How to find all the classes of..
Posted 2023-08-11 by iCert Global.
Copying files from host to Docker container..
Posted 2023-08-11 by iCert Global.
how to exit a python script in..
Posted 2022-11-16 by iCert Global.
How to import a jar file in..
Posted 2022-11-16 by iCert Global.

Disclaimer

  • "PMI®", "PMBOK®", "PMP®", "CAPM®" and "PMI-ACP®" are registered marks of the Project Management Institute, Inc.
  • "CSM", "CST" are Registered Trade Marks of The Scrum Alliance, USA.
  • COBIT® is a trademark of ISACA® registered in the United States and other countries.
  • CBAP® and IIBA® are registered trademarks of International Institute of Business Analysis™.

We Accept

We Accept

Follow Us

iCertGlobal facebook icon
iCertGlobal twitter
iCertGlobal linkedin

iCertGlobal Instagram
iCertGlobal twitter
iCertGlobal Youtube

Quick Enquiry Form

watsapp WhatsApp Us  /      +1 (713)-287-1187